There was rampant misunderstanding in connection with rules and accounting that could govern postal banking. Opponents declare that brand brand new monetary solutions would economically tank USPS and afterwards produce an unsustainable financial burden when it comes to government that is federal.
However these issues donвЂ™t mount up. To start with, the postoffice just isn’t directly funded by income tax profits. The Postal Reorganization Act of 1970 has lawfully forced USPS to be self-sufficient, to create its income from the very own solutions, whatever draconian cuts Congress has since imposed. Additionally, the analysis because of the Inspector General recommends USPS it self probably will make a profit away from brand brand new economic solutions through modest charges and interest.
Then a stable postal banking system could be our best defense if preventing Main Street from falling into the flames along with Wall Street is indeed a national concern.
Nevertheless, no matter what the post officeвЂ™s own financial predicament, the federal governmentвЂ™s balance sheet doesn’t consist of USPS assets and liabilities. Certainly, the separation is really complete that thereвЂ™s an uniquely silly legislation mandating USPS put aside money today for several future retiree healthy benefits вЂ” without subsidy through the Treasury. This burden that is unique that is maybe perhaps maybe maybe not imposed upon some other federal federal government enterprise, may be the main reason for USPSвЂ™ economic woes.
Regardless if USPS funds had been contained in the wider budget that is federal as they arguably should be вЂ” Deficit Hawk policies just like the pre-funding requirement will make also less feeling. As Deficit Owls, like previous Deputy Treasury Secretary Frank Newman, assert, asking an agency that is federal funded by the U.S.